Effectiveness of Cooking Methods on Presence of Food Borne Pathogens in Chicken based Meat Products
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The food borne diseases are often unnoticed and source of infection is always not confirmative. The consumption of street and fast food has been popularising in developing country like India. The present study was to taken up to assess the effect of different cooking procedures followed by street food vendors and fast food outlets in Chennai city, India. The food borne pathogens viz., Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp, Staphylococcus aureus and Campylobacter jejuni studied by artificially inoculating in chicken meat preparation at level of 100 cfu/g and 1000 cfu/g. The different chicken based meat preparation and cooking practice followed were viz. pan frying for chicken 65 and chilly chicken, oven cooking for tandoori chicken and electric grilling in grilled chicken. The core temperature of 82.8ËšC, 83.8ËšC, 74.3ËšC and 75.3ËšC was achieved in chicken 65, chilly chicken, tandoori chicken and grilled chicken, respectively. The different cooking methods resulted in complete elimination (absent in 25 g of product) of all food borne pathogens viz., Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp, Staphylococcus aureus and Campylobacter jejuni at both 100 cfu/g and 1000 cfu/g and reaching satisfactory core temperature of 720C in above. Thus, cooking procedures by street food vendors and fast food outlets in Indian condition often produce safe chicken products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".