MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765826671 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62597-3_46

Topic Study Group No. 19: Problem Solving in Mathematics Education

2017· book-chapter· en· W2765826671 on OpenAlex
Peter Liljedahl, Manuel Santos‐Trigo, Guido Pinkernell, Laurent Vivier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueICME-13 monographs · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational Games and Gamification
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationGroup (periodic table)Computer scienceAlgebra over a fieldMathematicsPure mathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mathematical problem solving has been an important research and practice domain in mathematics education worldwide. It's agenda focuses not only on analysing the extent to which cognitive, social, and affective factors influence and shape learners' development of problem solving proficiency, but also on the role played as a medium for teaching and learning mathematics and the development of both teachers' and learners' problem solving proficiencies. TSG 19 on Problem Solving in Mathematics Education was dedicated to the furthering and sharing of knowledge on this important topic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it