MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765840980 · doi:10.1182/blood-2017-09-805424

Finding active LCH cells in the blood

2017· letter· en· W2765840980 on OpenAlexaff
Oussama Abla

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2017
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistiocytic Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThymic stromal lymphopoietinLangerhans cell histiocytosisCD14ImmunologyPeripheral bloodHistiocytosisBiologyMedicinePathologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this issue of Blood , Carrera Silva et al demonstrate that CD207 + CD1a + circulating cells are increased in the peripheral blood of children with active Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), in comparison with children with nonactive LCH and with healthy adults. Furthermore, CD14 + monocytes express CD207 in these patients under the influence of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β). 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHistiocytic Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207