MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765849583 · doi:10.1002/2017gc007026

Understanding Copper Isotope Behavior in the High Temperature Magmatic‐Hydrothermal Porphyry Environment

2017· article· en· W2765849583 on OpenAlex
Melissa J. Gregory, Ryan Mathur

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsGeologyHypogeneHydrothermal circulationChalcopyriteGeochemistryFractionationPorphyry copper depositArgillic alterationIlliteIsotope fractionationFluid inclusionsMineralogyCopperClay mineralsChemistryPyriteVolcanic rockSphalerite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Copper stable isotope geochemistry has the potential to constrain aspects of ore deposit formation once variations in the isotopic data can be related to the physiochemical conditions during metal deposition. This study presents Cu isotope ratios for samples from the Pebble porphyry Cu‐Au‐Mo deposit in Alaska. The δ 65 Cu values for hypogene copper sulfides range from −2.09‰ to 1.11‰ and show linear correlations with the δ 18 O isotope ratios calculated for the fluid in equilibrium with the hydrothermal alteration minerals in each sample. Samples with sodic‐potassic, potassic, and illite alteration display a negative linear correlation between the Cu and O isotope results. This suggests that fractionation of Cu isotopes between the fluid and precipitating chalcopyrite is positive as the hydrothermal fluid is evolving from magmatic to mixed magmatic‐meteoric compositions. Samples with advanced argillic alteration display a weak positive linear correlation between Cu and O isotope results consistent with small negative fluid‐chalcopyrite Cu isotope fractionation during fluid evolution. The hydrothermal fluids that formed sodic‐potassic, potassic, and illite alteration likely transported Cu as CuHS 0 . Hydrothermal fluids that resulted in advanced argillic alteration likely transport Cu as . The pH conditions also control Cu isotope fractionation, consistent with previous experimental work. Larger fractionation factors were found between fluids and chalcopyrite precipitating under neutral conditions contrasting with small fractionation factors calculated between fluids and chalcopyrite precipitating under acidic conditions. Therefore, this study proposes that hydrothermal fluid compositions and pH conditions are related to Cu isotope variations in high temperature magmatic‐hydrothermal deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it