MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2765858428 · doi:10.1142/s0219498818501979

The index of a quartic field defined by a trinomial X4 + aX + b

2017· article· en· W2765858428 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Algebra and Its Applications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuartic functionTrinomialMathematicsPrime (order theory)CombinatoricsField (mathematics)Congruence (geometry)PolynomialOrder (exchange)Prime powerPure mathematicsMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider an irreducible quartic polynomial of the form [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] satisfy [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] denotes the exact power of a rational prime [Formula: see text] that divides an integer. Such a polynomial is called a [Formula: see text]-minimal quartic. Let [Formula: see text] be a field defined by a [Formula: see text]-minimal quartic. In this paper, we use [Formula: see text]-integral bases and introduce the concept of [Formula: see text]-index forms in order to determine the field index of [Formula: see text] via the coefficients of a defining polynomial in terms of certain congruence conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it