MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Soybean meal-induced enteritis in Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar) and Chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) but not in pink salmon ( O . gorbuscha )

2017· article· en· W2765860769 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAquaculture · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward IslandUniversity of AlbertaFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAtlantic Veterinary College
KeywordsSalmoOncorhynchusChinook windBiologySoybean mealFish mealAquacultureSalmonidaeEnteritisAnimal scienceFisheryAtlantic codFood scienceMicrobiologyFish <Actinopterygii>Ecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To improve sustainability in the aquaculture industry plant meals are increasingly used to replace fish meal in fish feed. Solvent-extracted soybean meal (SBM) is an attractive protein source for fish feed because of its high protein content, favorable amino acid profile, and low cost. In Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), SBM at low levels causes soybean meal-induced enteritis (SBMIE). Few studies have been done with SBM in Pacific salmon, and none of those have included intestinal inflammation analysis. To gain more insight into salmonid responses to SBM, we assessed and compared the effects of SBM on intestinal morphology, inflammation and microbiome composition of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), pink salmon (O. gorbuscha) and Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Atlantic, Chinook and pink salmon were fed for three weeks on a diet with 20% inclusion of SBM, or a control diet with fish meal. After one week on the SBM diet, Atlantic and Chinook salmon showed increased submucosa thickness in the distal intestine compared to the fish fed on the fishmeal diet. Intestinal inflammation in these species increased over time, with a further increase in submucosa thickness coincident with an infiltration of eosinophilic granular and mononuclear leucocytes. After 3 weeks on the SBM diet, intestinal inflammation was most severe in Chinook salmon. In contrast, pink salmon only showed a slight increase in submucosa thickness after three weeks on the SBM diet, and no significant increase in inflammatory cell infiltrate. Sequence-based analysis of the intestinal microbiome showed a significant difference in overall microbiome composition between species, but did not show an effect of the SBM diet on microbiome diversity or composition in any of the three salmon species. In conclusion, SBM-fed Chinook salmon were more susceptible to SBMIE than Atlantic salmon whereas pink salmon were not susceptible to SBMIE at the levels of SBM tested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it