Granular Representation of Data: A Design of Families of <i>ϵ</i>-Information Granules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fuzzy clustering has emerged as one of the fundamental conceptual and algorithmic frameworks supporting the development of information granules. Generic fuzzy clustering such as fuzzy C-means (FCM) has been utilized in a broad range of applications. However, the constructs resulting from fuzzy clustering, namely a partition matrix and prototypes, are numeric and as such are not capable of fully capturing the essence of the overall data. In this study, we propose an alternative augmented way of building information granules by generating hypercube-like information granules. A collection of hypercubes is referred to as a family of ε-information granules. This family is constructed around numeric prototypes generated through a modified version of the FCM algorithm whose running time is linear with respect to the number of clusters. By admitting a certain level of information granularity (ε), a collection of hypercubes is formed around the prototypes. The quality of information granules realized in this way is assessed by involving them in the granulation-degranulation process as well as determining a value of the coverage criterion. The level of information granularity and the number of the granular prototypes in the family of ε-information granules form an important design asset directly impacting the obtained coverage level of the data. The computational facet of the approach is stressed. It has been demonstrated that the granular enhancements of the description of data come with a very limited computing overhead. Experimental studies involve synthetic data as well as data coming from the UCI Machine Learning repository. The granular reconstruction capabilities delivered by the family of ε-information granules are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".