MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766002201 · doi:10.1002/2017wr020754

Advancing Physically‐Based Flow Simulations of Alluvial Systems Through Atmospheric Noble Gases and the Novel <sup>37</sup>Ar Tracer Method

2017· article· en· W2766002201 on OpenAlexaff
Oliver S. Schilling, Christoph Gerber, Daniel Partington, Roland Purtschert, Matthias S. Brennwald, Rolf Kipfer, Daniel Hunkeler, Philip Brunner

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersEidgenössische Anstalt für Wasserversorgung Abwasserreinigung und GewässerschutzSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTRACERAquiferAlluviumGroundwaterEnvironmental scienceMixing (physics)Hydrology (agriculture)Residence time (fluid dynamics)Noble gasGroundwater flowGeologyAtmospheric sciencesGeomorphologyChemistryPhysicsGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To provide a sound understanding of the sources, pathways, and residence times of groundwater water in alluvial river‐aquifer systems, a combined multitracer and modeling experiment was carried out in an important alluvial drinking water wellfield in Switzerland. 222 Rn, 3 H/ 3 He, atmospheric noble gases, and the novel 37 Ar‐method were used to quantify residence times and mixing ratios of water from different sources. With a half‐life of 35.1 days, 37 Ar allowed to successfully close a critical observational time gap between 222 Rn and 3 H/ 3 He for residence times of weeks to months. Covering the entire range of residence times of groundwater in alluvial systems revealed that, to quantify the fractions of water from different sources in such systems, atmospheric noble gases and helium isotopes are tracers suited for end‐member mixing analysis. A comparison between the tracer‐based mixing ratios and mixing ratios simulated with a fully‐integrated, physically‐based flow model showed that models, which are only calibrated against hydraulic heads, cannot reliably reproduce mixing ratios or residence times of alluvial river‐aquifer systems. However, the tracer‐based mixing ratios allowed the identification of an appropriate flow model parametrization. Consequently, for alluvial systems, we recommend the combination of multitracer studies that cover all relevant residence times with fully‐coupled, physically‐based flow modeling to better characterize the complex interactions of river‐aquifer systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Resources ResearchSame topicGroundwater flow and contamination studiesFrench-language works237,207