MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766015177 · doi:10.1142/s0219887818500408

Quasi-periodic solutions to a negative-order integrable system of 2-component KdV equation

2017· article· en· W2766015177 on OpenAlexaff
Jinbing Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsKorteweg–de Vries equationMathematicsIntegrable systemLax pairInvariant subspaceMathematical analysisPure mathematicsNonlinear systemPhysicsLinear subspace

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the backward and forward Neumann type systems are generalized to deduce the quasi-periodic solutions for a negative-order integrable system of 2-component KdV equation. The 2-component negative-order KdV (2-nKdV) equation is depicted as the zero-curvature representation of two spectral problems. It follows from a symmetric constraint that the 2-nKdV equation is reduced to a pair of backward and forward Neumann type systems, where the involutive solutions of Neumann type systems yield the finite parametric solutions of 2-nKdV equation. The negative-order Novikov equation is given to specify a finite-dimensional invariant subspace for the 2-nKdV flow. With a spectral curve given by the Lax matrix, the 2-nKdV flow is linearized on the Jacobi variety of a Riemann surface, which leads to the quasi-periodic solutions of 2-nKdV equation by using the Riemann-Jacobi inversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern PhysicsSame topicNonlinear Waves and SolitonsFrench-language works237,207