Un enseignement du français revisité par la perspective interculturelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis 30 ans, le système scolaire québécois s’est ouvert à la perspective interculturelle. Sous l’influence des courants migratoires et de la promotion de la diversité, tant le ministère de l’Éducation que des organismes publics et parapublics ont défendu l’idée de développer à l’école une compétence à s’intéresser à l’Autre, à le comprendre et à le respecter avec toutes ses différences, dans un esprit de tolérance ; d’où la nécessité d’un dialogue interculturel basé sur l’analyse et l’interprétation des valeurs avec un oeil relativisant. Les diverses disciplines scolaires en ont été touchées, dans leurs objectifs socioculturels de formation des jeunes. Le cas de l’enseignement du français, tant comme langue première que comme langue seconde, nous intéresse particulièrement, car il a été le premier à accorder de l’importance à la perspective interculturelle et continue à le faire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".