MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766032029 · doi:10.4000/ifha.8803

Martin Kintzinger, Frank Rexroth, Jörg Rogge (dir.), Gewalt und Widerstand in der politischen Kultur des späten Mittelalters

2017· article· de· W2766032029 on OpenAlexaff
Gisela Naegle

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2017
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’ouvrage collectif dirigé par Martin Kintzinger, Frank Rexroth et Jörg Rogge est issu d’un colloque du Konstanzer Arbeitskreis de 2009. Son sujet, la violence, a beaucoup retenu l’intérêt de l’historiographie récente. Le livre poursuit les réflexions que deux des éditeurs avaient déjà lancées avec « Gewalt gegen Könige. Macht und Mord im spätmittelalterlichen Europa » (« La violence contre les rois. Pouvoir et assassinat en Europe à la fin du Moyen Âge », 2004). Les douze articles sont enca...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en AllemagneSame topicHistorical, Literary, and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207