MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766039066 · doi:10.5539/ells.v7n4p42

A Memetic Study of Internet Buzzwords

2017· article· en· W2766039066 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tingting Li

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish Language and Literature Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Communication and Language
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJiangsu Provincial Department of EducationYancheng Teachers UniversityGovernment of Jiangsu Province
KeywordsChaiMemeticsImitationThe InternetInformation transmissionLinguisticsComputer scienceSociologyPsychologyPhilosophyArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide WebSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, a kind of four-character Chinese internet buzzwords like Ren Jian Bu Chai (人艰不拆) appears as a main part of internet language and attracts the attention of the linguistic field. Based on the theory of Memetics, this paper analyzes the motivation, periodicity and mechanism behind the wide imitation and transmission of Ren Jian Bu Chai as a language meme, which highlights the following three major findings: first, the pragmatic functions motivate the wide transmission and imitation of the language meme of Ren Jian Bu Chai; second, the wide spread of Ren Jian Bu Chai as a meme undergoes four stages which are assimilation, retention, expression and transmission; third, the meme of Ren Jian Bu Chai is widely transmitted and copied through two major channels, namely genotype and phenotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish Language and Literature StudiesSame topicDigital Communication and LanguageFrench-language works237,207