MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766049643 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckx189.259

Health information for asylum seekers in transit centers in Norway

2017· article· en· W2766049643 on OpenAlexaff
Sonja Myhre, Anne‐Marie Bergh

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeTransit (satellite)MedicinePolitical scienceBusinessCriminologyPsychologyPublic transportLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Migration is a significant public health issue throughout the world due to large numbers of asylum seekers fleeing war, economic instability or political unrest. Essential needs of migrants include food, shelter, access to health and security as well as information. This study, commissioned by the Directorate of Immigration in Norway, presents findings from a report by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health and NAKMI investigating how health and access to health is communicated to newly arrived asylum seekers in Norway. Methods During February, 2017, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 asylum seekers, 9 health care providers, and 13 reception center employees at five transit centers in Norway. All interviews were tape recorded and conducted in Norwegian, English, Arabic or Tigrinya. Thematic areas addressed rights, the health care system, and health prevention. Results Preliminary findings note that health information in the transit phase is limited. Little systematic information are provided on rights, the health system, or health prevention or promotion. Focus is instead on access to urgent medical needs, hygiene, tuberculosis screening, vaccination, and basic health habits. Mental health, sleeping problems or trauma seem rarely to be addressed unless there is an acute situation. Coping mechanisms, nutrition or chronic conditions are not prioritized topics. Diversity, in terms of education, age, language, and expectations impact communication strategies. Conclusions Health information provided to asylum seekers in the transit phase has implications for how they understand, access, and navigate the health system and can influence health-seeking and health-promoting behaviors. The study findings will inform government authorities on how to better exploit opportunities to provide health information to asylum seekers. With increasing pressures of migration, it is critical to understand how to optimize health communication strategies. Key messages: The vital role of health communication to address health literacy has potential to facilitate and improve health seeking behaviors as well as support health promoting behaviors among asylum seekers. Understanding the communication landscape of asylum seekers has implications for improving information about rights, systems, and health promotion that can thereby enhance health of asylum seekers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207