MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766074685

Words and Shape Similiarity Guide 13-month-olds' Inferences about Nonobvious Object Properties

2001· article· en· W2766074685 on OpenAlexafffund
Susan A. Graham, Cari S. Kilbreath, Andrea N. Welder

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Animal Learning Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFondation pour la Recherche Médicale
KeywordsSimilarity (geometry)PsychologyProperty (philosophy)Object (grammar)PremiseCognitionTest (biology)Cognitive psychologyArtificial intelligenceSocial psychologyCognitive scienceComputer scienceLinguisticsEpistemologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined the influence of shape similarity and object labels on 13-month-old infants' inductive inferences.In two experiments, infants were presented with novel target objects with or without a nonobvious property, followed by test objects that varied in shape similarity to the target.When objects were not labeled, infants generalized the nonobvious property to test objects that were highly similar in shape (Expt.1).When objects were labeled with novel nouns, infants generalized the nonobvious property to both high shape similarity and low shape similarity test objects (Expt.2).These findings indicate that infants as young as 13 months of age expect those objects which share the same shape or the same label to possess the same nonobvious property.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.524
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207