MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766130388 · doi:10.1164/rccm.201702-0386oc

Loss of SMAD3 Promotes Vascular Remodeling in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension via MRTF Disinhibition

2017· article· en· W2766130388 on OpenAlexaff
Diana Zabini, Elise Granton, Yijie Hu, Maria Zena Miranda, Ulrike Weichelt, Sandra Breuils Bonnet, Sébastien Bonnet, Nicholas W. Morrell, Kim A. Connelly, Steeve Provencher, Bahil Ghanim, Walter Klepetko, Andrea Olschewski, András Kapùs, Wolfgang M. Kuebler

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversité LavalSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersBritish Heart Foundation
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary arteryBMPR2Pulmonary hypertensionMyocardinSMADBone morphogenetic proteinHypoxia (environmental)LungMuscle hypertrophyGene silencingVascular smooth muscleVascular remodelling in the embryoInternal medicineRight ventricular hypertrophyTransforming growth factorCancer researchEndocrinologyTranscription factorBiologyChemistrySmooth muscleSerum response factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RATIONALE: Vascular remodeling in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) results from smooth muscle cell hypertrophy and proliferation of vascular cells. Loss of BMPR-II (bone morphogenetic protein receptor 2) signaling and increased signaling via TGF-β (transforming growth factor β) and its downstream mediators SMAD (small body size [a C. elegans protein] mothers against decapentaplegic [a Drosophila protein family])-2/3 has been proposed to drive lung vascular remodeling; yet, proteomic analyses indicate a loss of SMAD3 in PAH. OBJECTIVES: We proposed that SMAD3 may be dysregulated in PAH and that loss of SMAD3 may present a pathophysiological master switch by disinhibiting its interaction partner, MRTF (myocardin-related transcription factor), which drives muscle protein expression. METHODS: SMAD3 levels were measured in lungs from PAH patients, rats treated either with Sugen/hypoxia or monocrotaline (MCT), and in mice carrying a BMPR2 mutation. In vitro, effects of SMAD3 or BMPR2 silencing or SMAD3 overexpression on cell proliferation or smooth muscle hypertrophy were assessed. In vivo, the therapeutic and prophylactic potential of CCG1423, an inhibitor of MRTF, was investigated in Sugen/hypoxia rats. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: SMAD3 was downregulated in lungs of patients with PAH and in pulmonary arteries of three independent PAH animal models. TGF-β treatment replicated the loss of SMAD3 in human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (huPASMCs) and human pulmonary artery endothelial cells. SMAD3 silencing increased proliferation and migration in huPASMCs and human pulmonary artery endothelial cells. Coimmunoprecipitation revealed reduced interaction of MRTF with SMAD3 in TGF-β-treated huPASMCs and pulmonary arteries of PAH animal models. In huPASMCs, loss of SMAD3 or BMPR-II increased smooth muscle actin expression, which was attenuated by MRTF inhibition. Conversely, SMAD3 overexpression prevented TGF-β-induced activation of an MRTF reporter and reduced actin stress fibers in BMPR2-silenced huPASMCs. MRTF inhibition attenuated PAH and lung vascular remodeling in Sugen/hypoxia rats. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of SMAD3 presents a novel pathomechanism in PAH that promotes vascular cell proliferation and-via MRTF disinhibition-hypertrophy of huPASMCs, thereby reconciling the parallel induction of a synthetic and contractile huPASMC phenotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207