MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ultra-broadband V-band fractal T-square antenna

2017· article· en· W2766152610 on OpenAlexaff
Ousama Abu Safia, Mourad Nedil

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFractal antennaBroadbandFractalSquare (algebra)TelecommunicationsAntenna (radio)PhysicsElectronic engineeringMicrostrip antennaComputer scienceMathematicsEngineeringAntenna factorGeometryMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A corner CPW-fed T-square fractal antenna is proposed. This fractal layout provides a wider bandwidth compared to typical square patches. The proposed antenna is designed to operate within the V-band millimeter-wave frequency range and found to cover a 10 dB return loss bandwidth of 19.2 GHz which presents 54.9% of the entire V-band. The ground plane of the antenna is limited to the feeding line, and a monopole-like radiation pattern is achieved. The gain values gradually increase throughout the ultra-broadband operational bandwidth and reaches a maximum value of 5.7 dBi. The efficiency of the antenna is considered high with a maximum value of 87.6%. The layout of the antenna can be scaled in order to fit other frequency bands; such as the ultra-wideband frequency band.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.674

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207