MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766182351 · doi:10.1002/9781119158042.ch71

Recent Advances in Phytochemicals in Fruits and Vegetables

2017· other· en· W2766182351 on OpenAlexaff
Fereidoon Shahidi, Priyatharini Ambigaipalan, Anoma Chandrasekara

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPotato Plant Research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAglyconeChemistryGlycoalkaloidOrganolepticOrganosulfur compoundsFood scienceAnthocyanidinsClementine (nuclear reactor)BotanyOrganic chemistrySolanaceaeGlycosideBiochemistryBiologyPolyphenolAntioxidant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter briefly summarizes the recent advances in phytochemicals from selected fruits and vegetables. Phenolic compounds, which are secondary plant metabolites, are commonly found in fruits and their products. The composition of phenolic compounds in fruits and vegetables varies considerably. Phenolic compounds influence the quality of fruits, especially contributing to their organoleptic qualities. Phenolics in vegetables may be present in both free and bound forms. There are two different kinds of organosulfur compounds present in Brassica vegetables, namely glucosinolates and S-methyl cysteine sulfoxide, derived in plant tissues during the biosynthesis of amino acids. Alkaloids are nitrogen-containing secondary metabolites found mainly in several higher plants. They are commonly found in the family Solanaceae. Two major glycoalkaloids in commercial potatoes are glycosylated derivatives of the aglycone solanidine, namely α-chaconine and α-solanine, whereas the major glycoalkaloid reported in tomatoes is α-tomatine, which is a glycosylated derivative of aglycone tomatidine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPotato Plant ResearchFrench-language works237,207