MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766229516 · doi:10.7202/1041622ar

Repenser l’autochtonie dans sa globalité : The Fourth World de George Manuel et l’historiographie canadienne

2017· article· fr· W2766229516 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Yanick Turcotte

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers d histoire · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeorge (robot)ArtPolitical sciencePhilosophyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La question du changement d’échelle en histoire autochtone entraîne, par conséquent, des interrogations sur la définition de son sujet d’étude, soit l’autochtonicité. En retournant à l’ouvrage classique The Fourth World de George Manuel et Michael Posluns, cet article propose de réfléchir sur les méthodes d’étudier l’histoire autochtone à l’échelle mondiale. Le « Quatrième Monde », concept mis de l’avant par Manuel, permet de réfléchir sur deux façons d’aborder cette histoire, à la fois comme un projet politique global et comme une réalité partagée par divers peuples répartis sur les cinq continents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0300.025
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers d histoireSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207