Manipulating trypsin digestion conditions to accelerate proteolysis and simplify digestion workflows in development of protein mass spectrometric assays for the clinical laboratory
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For ease of measurement and accurate identification of proteins by mass spectrometry, protein targets are commonly cleaved into peptides. Protein digestion is a critical step in sample preparation, yielding peptides amenable to both chromatographic separation and mass spectrometric analysis. Trypsin is the most extensively used protease due to its high cleavage specificity; however, it can yield highly variable digestion profiles and is dependent on several factors including digestion buffer, denaturant, trypsin quality selected, and composition/complexity of the sample matrix. Historically, trypsin digestion protocols have relied on lengthy digestion times-which are unsuitable for many clinical applications-to ensure effective proteolysis. Here, we performed an iterative and comprehensive evaluation of digestion conditions for five structurally diverse proteins in plasma and serum: apolipoprotein A-1, retinol-binding protein 4, transthyretin, complement component 9 and C-reactive protein. Conditions were monitored for improvements in signal intensity, reproducibility of digestion profile, and rate of release of proteolytic peptides. This approach yielded an optimized digestion protocol for detection of all five proteins in a single workflow requiring a brief 20 min digestion, without the use of chemical denaturants or reduction/alkylation steps, and only 1 μl of plasma. It is our hope that this data can accelerate the development phase of targeted mass spectrometric protein assays by identifying practical approaches to accelerate and simplify digestion protocols for clinical applications and assist with the selection of tryptic peptides for protein quantitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it