MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Robust extraction of rectangular waveguide surrogate models of wave propagation in tunnels

2017· article· en· W2766233967 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Wave Propagation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalogySurrogate modelWaveguideWave propagationComputer scienceExtraction (chemistry)AcousticsPhysicsOpticsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Before the development of modern computational techniques, wave propagation in tunnel and mine environments was analytically modeled by drawing an analogy between such environments and standard, over-moded electromagnetic waveguides. While this analogy is physically intuitive and insightful, an open question is whether standard waveguides can serve as proper surrogate models of general tunnel environments, especially when the cross-section of the latter is arched and if so, what are their corresponding dimensions. Such models can lead to analytical, rapid propagation prediction over very long distances. We present a systematic approach to derive rectangular waveguide surrogate models for general tunnel geometries and demonstrate its accuracy and efficiency in practical cases of road and subway tunnels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Wave Propagation StudiesFrench-language works237,207