Sparse Grid Discretizations based on a Discontinuous Galerkin Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examine and extend Sparse Grids as a discretization method for partial differential equations (PDEs). Solving a PDE in $D$ dimensions has a cost that grows as $O(N^D)$ with commonly used methods. Even for moderate $D$ (e.g. $D=3$), this quickly becomes prohibitively expensive for increasing problem size $N$. This effect is known as the Curse of Dimensionality. Sparse Grids offer an alternative discretization method with a much smaller cost of $O(N \log^{D-1}N)$. In this paper, we introduce the reader to Sparse Grids, and extend the method via a Discontinuous Galerkin approach. We then solve the scalar wave equation in up to $6+1$ dimensions, comparing cost and accuracy between full and sparse grids. Sparse Grids perform far superior, even in three dimensions. Our code is freely available as open source, and we encourage the reader to reproduce the results we show.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".