MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766257257 · doi:10.1080/19336950.2017.1395536

Conservation and variability of the pore-lining helices in P-loop channels

2017· article· en· W2766257257 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChannels · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIon channel regulation and function
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmembrane domainBiophysicsIon channelHelix (gastropod)ExtracellularSodium channelBiologyFolding (DSP implementation)ChemistryTransmembrane proteinHomology modelingCell biologyComputational biologyAmino acidBiochemistrySodium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The family of P-loop channels, which play key roles in the cell physiology, is characterized by four membrane re-entering extracellular P-loops that connect eight transmembrane helices of the pore-forming domain. The X-ray and cryo-EM structures of the open- and closed-state channels show conserved state-dependent folding despite the sequences are very diverse. In sodium, calcium, TRPV and two-pore channels, the pore-lining helices contain conserved asparagines and may or may not include π-helix bulges. Comparison of the sequence- and 3D-alignemnts suggests that the asparagines appeared in evolution as insertions that are accommodated in two ways: by π-helix bulges, which preserve most of inter-segment contacts, or by twists of the C-terminal thirds and switch of inter-segment contacts. The two possibilities should be considered in homology modeling of ion channels and in structure-based interpretations of numerous experimental data on physiology, pathophysiology, pharmacology and toxicology of the channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it