MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766268737 · doi:10.4000/books.pulg.2364

Louis Dantin : le refus de la malédiction comme reconnaissance

2014· book-chapter· fr· W2766268737 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Hébert

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Liège eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDictionArtHumanitiesLiteraturePoetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[…] si je cherche l’ombre, c’est de mon propre et libre choix.Louis Dantin à Germain Beaulieu, 12 avril 1909J’ai été fait pour vivre en paix avec tout le monde et rien ne me bouleverse comme de me voir engagé malgré moi dans une lutte contre ma famille, mes anciens amis, contre la société presque, qui ne devra finir qu’avec ma vie.Louis Dantin à Germain Beaulieu, s.d.Louis Dantin (1865-1945 ; pseudonyme d’Eugène Seers) fut le critique le plus influent de la première demie du XXe siècle au Qu...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.014
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Liège eBooksSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207