MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766315272 · doi:10.7202/1041178ar

L’éthique de la reconnaissance comme posture d’intervention pour travailler avec les jeunes trans

2017· article· fr· W2766315272 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Annie Pullen Sansfaçon, Céline Bellot

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles pratiques sociales · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, il est question des enjeux auxquels font face les jeunes trans et la contribution de l’éthique de la reconnaissance de Honneth à l’intervention auprès de cette population qui fait face à de nombreux dénis de reconnaissance. À partir de cette perspective d’analyse qui offre un espace pour la réflexion et l’action, l’article présente des pistes d’interventions qui permettent d’étayer les pratiques, en soutenir l’enfant et sa famille, mais également en impliquant les jeunes dans les changements sociaux et structuraux nécessaires à l’épanouissement des personnes de tous genres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles pratiques socialesSame topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207