MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766336950 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2017.2768432

Model Predictive Control of Distributed Generations With Feed-Forward Output Currents

2017· article· en· W2766336950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogridControl theory (sociology)Robustness (evolution)Model predictive controlInverterDistributed generationEngineeringFeed forwardGridVoltageTransient (computer programming)Computer scienceControl engineeringControl (management)MathematicsRenewable energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a voltage and frequency control scheme based on model predictive control is proposed for inverter-based distributed generations (DGs). Currents injected into an off-grid system (e.g., a passive network with loads or an islanded microgrid) at the point of common coupling of the DG are considered as disturbances and used as feed-forward signals. These signals enhance the transient performance of the DG control system for a wide range of switched loads as well as for switching and operating the DG in an islanded microgrid. The stability and robustness of the proposed control scheme are analyzed and discussed. The effectiveness of the scheme is demonstrated by extensive time-domain simulations using PSCAD/EMTDC for various loads (such as balanced/imbalanced, and nonlinear and dynamic loads), fault conditions, and DG operation after switching in an islanded microgrid. Comparison of the obtained results with those of three previously developed schemes shows superiority of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it