MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766378524 · doi:10.1126/science.aaq0186

Early spectra of the gravitational wave source GW170817: Evolution of a neutron star merger

2017· article· en· W2766378524 on OpenAlexafffund
B. J. Shappee, Joshua D. Simon, M. R. Drout, Anthony L. Piro, N. Morrell, J. L. Prieto, Daniel Kasen, T. W. S. Holoien, Juna A. Kollmeier, Daniel D. Kelson, D. A. Coulter, R. J. Foley, C. D. Kilpatrick, M. R. Siebert, Barry F. Madore, Ariadna Murguia-Berthier, Y. C. Pan, J. X. Prochaska, E. Ramírez-Ruiz, A. Rest, C. Adams, Katherine Alatalo, Eduardo Bañados, J. Baughman, Rebecca A. Bernstein, T. Bitsakis, K. Boutsia, J. Bravo, F. Di Mille, Clare Higgs, Alexander P. Ji, G. Maravelias, J. L. Marshall, Vinicius M. Placco, G. Prieto, Zhen Wan

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersNuclear PhysicsUniversity of TorontoJoint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics - Center for the Evolution of the ElementsU.S. Department of EnergyGordon and Betty Moore FoundationSpace Telescope Science InstituteAlfred P. Sloan FoundationNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsNeutron starEjectaAstrophysicsGravitational waveSupernovaKilonovaSpectral linePhotosphereAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On 17 August 2017, Swope Supernova Survey 2017a (SSS17a) was discovered as the optical counterpart of the binary neutron star gravitational wave event GW170817. We report time-series spectroscopy of SSS17a from 11.75 hours until 8.5 days after the merger. Over the first hour of observations, the ejecta rapidly expanded and cooled. Applying blackbody fits to the spectra, we measured the photosphere cooling from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] kelvin, and determined a photospheric velocity of roughly 30% of the speed of light. The spectra of SSS17a began displaying broad features after 1.46 days and evolved qualitatively over each subsequent day, with distinct blue (early-time) and red (late-time) components. The late-time component is consistent with theoretical models of r-process-enriched neutron star ejecta, whereas the blue component requires high-velocity, lanthanide-free material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations345
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207