MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of Occupational Licensing and Unions on Compensation in Canada

2016· article· en· W2766432544 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tingting Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicOccupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnobservableOccupational licensingCompensation (psychology)EconomicsLongitudinal dataFixed effects modelDemographic economicsPanel dataLabour economicsEconometricsDemographyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on longitudinal data from the Canadian Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (SLID) from 1993 to 2010, a pay premium of approximately 15 percent is estimated for both occupational licensing and unions, based on a cross-section of OLS estimates similar to estimates found in the United States. Fixed-effect estimates from the longitudinal data, however, are approximately half those amounts, suggesting the importance of unobservable factors. The occupational pay premium is about twice as high for females as for males in both the OLS and fixed-effect estimates, while the union pay premium is slightly higher for females than for males. The occupational licensing premium overwhelmingly reflects the premium for licensed professionals, with little or no premium in the compulsory licensed trades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management ProceedingsSame topicOccupational and Professional Licensing RegulationFrench-language works237,207