MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766435898 · doi:10.1109/temc.2017.2763952

Frequency Response of Electric and Magnetic Fields of Overhead Conductors With Particular Reference to Axial Electric Field

2017· article· en· W2766435898 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric fieldConductorElectrical conductorPhysicsMagnetic fieldOptical fieldElectromagnetic fieldCondensed matter physicsTransverse planeTransmission lineElectric power transmissionPerfect conductorAttenuationNuclear magnetic resonanceComputational physicsElectrical engineeringOpticsEngineeringMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Complete electric and magnetic field solutions of an overhead conductor above a lossy earth are derived in this letter, and “mode transition” from a low-frequency quasi-transverse electromagnetic (TEM) to a high-frequency transverse Magnetic (TM) mode has been investigated by means of axial electric field Ex . The calculated results of Ex show a clear correlation with the line attenuation constant during the mode transition. This characteristic is not observed in the axial electric field evaluated by the classical transmission line approach. The horizontal electric field Ey, vertical electric field Ez, and magnetic field H near to the conductor surface are nearly frequency-independent. As a result, the well-known analytical formulas assuming a perfectly conducting earth agree well with those calculated by the complete field solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it