Dynamic network data envelopment analysis based upon technology changes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The existing dynamic models assume the technology is unchanged in which the same factor should have the same multiplier, no matter which process it is associated with. The internal network structures embedded in a multi-period system are ignored in the literature. The current paper considers that the technology is changed in the dynamic system The same factor may have different multipliers in different periods, except for the variables of intermediate measures connecting two stages in one period and flows connecting two consecutive periods. An additive aggregation dynamic network data envelopment analysis is developed to measure the multi-period systems with a two-stage process embedded in each period. The system efficiency, overall efficiency and stage efficiencies of each period can be derived, and the relationship between the system efficiency and period efficiencies can be identified. The newly developed dynamic network model is nonlinear, and can be transformed to a semi-definite programming problem. A case of high-tech industry in China is illustrated to the approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it