Les tensions entre mythe et action chez les révolutionnaires mexicains : Emiliano Zapata (1879-1919) et Pancho Villa (1878-1923)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emiliano Zapata (1879-1919) et Francisco « Pancho » Villa (1878-1923) sont deux figures légendaires de la mémoire collective de la Révolution mexicaine (1910-1920). Nous analysons la manière dont l’histoire de ces hommes d’action est travaillée par le mythe sous la forme d’images. Nous verrons la distinction qui s’impose entre les mythes populaires nés localement à partir du processus révolutionnaire et le mythe national véhiculé par l’Etat postrévolutionnaire à partir de 1920. Nous trouvons ici confirmation de la thèse avancée par Roland Barthes dans Mythologies, selon laquelle la révolution elle-même n’est pas un processus mythique puisqu’elle est caractérisée par l’action. Le mythe ne s’élabore qu’une fois que le processus se fige. L’analyse vise à libérer l’histoire de la Révolution du mythe pour mieux l’interroger en tant que moment privilégié du politique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".