MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766495239 · doi:10.20396/rho.v17i2.8644682

Formação de professores para educação profissional no Brasil: percurso histórico e desafios contemporâneos

2017· article· pt· W2766495239 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista HISTEDBR On-line · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Pedagogy and Practices
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContinuing educationHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophyMedicineMedical education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neste artigo, destacamos e contextualizamos historicamente algumas medidas tomadas pelo Estado brasileiro, voltadas para a formação de docentes para atuar na Educação Profissional, principalmente no século XX. Discutimos também os desafios para essa formação no contexto atual. A metodologia constou de pesquisa bibliográfica e de consultas à legislação acerca da formação docente para a Educação Profissional. Concluímos que essa formação, no século passado, foi realizada a partir de cursos emergenciais, rápidos e voltados às exigências do mercado. O atual cenário histórico apresenta desafios ainda maiores para a formação inicial e continuada desses docentes, em função da expansão da oferta da Educação Profissional, das especificidades desta modalidade e das exigências que estas impõem ao professor que, muitas vezes, nela se insere sem uma base pedagógica que oriente as suas práticas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.295
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.237
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it