MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766495653 · doi:10.4000/studifrancesi.10068

Éric Chevillard dans tous ses états, O. Bessard-Banquy et P. Jourde (dir.)

2017· article· fr· W2766495653 on OpenAlexaff
Gianmaria Finardi

Bibliographic record

VenueStudi Francesi · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European Literature and History
Canadian institutionsASTER
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Questa miscellanea, che ha per oggetto l’opera di Éric Chevillard, raccoglie gli atti del convegno internazionale tenutosi a Valence presso la sede distaccata dell’Università di Grenoble 3, nel marzo 2013. Nell’Introduction (pp. 7-14), secondo uno studio diacronico, Olivier Bessard-Banquy e Pierre Jourde passano in rassegna le opere costitutive del nutrito corpus chevillardiano, sottolineando la complessiva poliedricità della poetica di una delle voci preminenti e più spiazzanti dell’attuale ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudi FrancesiSame topicMedieval European Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207