MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766546127 · doi:10.2118/188166-ms

The Development & Field Results of a New, Advanced form of Sodium Silicate as a Cost Effective Solution for Treatment for Sustained Casing Pressure

2017· article· en· W2766546127 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael McDonald, Xianglian Li

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Thermal Well Integrity and Design Symposium · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete and Cement Materials Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSodium silicateSilicateSodiumChemical engineeringAqueous solutionMaterials scienceCasingMineralogyChemistryGeologyPetroleum engineeringComposite materialMetallurgyOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Often, gas travels through microfractures and channels and requires the use of a solids-free chemical to adequately fill and block gas pathways. Recent years have shown sodium silicate as an effective and environmentally friendly treatment option. With lower oil prices and increasing regulatory requirements there is a greater need to improve treatment performance and reduce costs in the treatment of surface casing vent flows and gas migration. Recognizing these needs, the chemistry of conventional sodium silicate was modified to allow for a broader range of application and provide improved physical properties upon setting. Conventional manufacturing methods produce aqueous sodium silicate with a defined range of molecular size, shape and charge. An alternative production method was developed that reduces the alkalinity and increases the silica ratio and is described as a high-ratio sodium silicate. The form and distribution of silica in solution is quite different than commercially available sodium silicate. The silicate molecules in solution are significantly larger and with a lower charge density. The change in silica structure positively impacts the setting of sodium silicate by polymerization and precipitation. Several of the commonly used setting agents used with sodium silicate and/or colloidal silica were investigated with the high-ratio sodium silicate. Compared to conventional silicates, the high-ratio silicate could achieve longer set times and was less prone to variations in setting agent concentration. Upon setting, the high-ratio sodium silicate showed excellent dimensional stability with significantly less setting agent requirement vs. conventional silicates. Initial field trials took place in Western Canada using two distinct placement techniques. The first approach was to squeeze the high-ratio silicate into microchannels as a standalone product. The second approach was as a compliment to a cement squeeze. Field results ranged from complete zonal isolation to reduced levels of gas migration. Where gas migration was not completely eliminated, data suggested that not all pathways were squeezed and/or there were secondary sources of gas. On-going field trials will allow for improvements and comparisons of placement techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Thermal Well Integrity and Design SymposiumSame topicConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207