The Development & Field Results of a New, Advanced form of Sodium Silicate as a Cost Effective Solution for Treatment for Sustained Casing Pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Often, gas travels through microfractures and channels and requires the use of a solids-free chemical to adequately fill and block gas pathways. Recent years have shown sodium silicate as an effective and environmentally friendly treatment option. With lower oil prices and increasing regulatory requirements there is a greater need to improve treatment performance and reduce costs in the treatment of surface casing vent flows and gas migration. Recognizing these needs, the chemistry of conventional sodium silicate was modified to allow for a broader range of application and provide improved physical properties upon setting. Conventional manufacturing methods produce aqueous sodium silicate with a defined range of molecular size, shape and charge. An alternative production method was developed that reduces the alkalinity and increases the silica ratio and is described as a high-ratio sodium silicate. The form and distribution of silica in solution is quite different than commercially available sodium silicate. The silicate molecules in solution are significantly larger and with a lower charge density. The change in silica structure positively impacts the setting of sodium silicate by polymerization and precipitation. Several of the commonly used setting agents used with sodium silicate and/or colloidal silica were investigated with the high-ratio sodium silicate. Compared to conventional silicates, the high-ratio silicate could achieve longer set times and was less prone to variations in setting agent concentration. Upon setting, the high-ratio sodium silicate showed excellent dimensional stability with significantly less setting agent requirement vs. conventional silicates. Initial field trials took place in Western Canada using two distinct placement techniques. The first approach was to squeeze the high-ratio silicate into microchannels as a standalone product. The second approach was as a compliment to a cement squeeze. Field results ranged from complete zonal isolation to reduced levels of gas migration. Where gas migration was not completely eliminated, data suggested that not all pathways were squeezed and/or there were secondary sources of gas. On-going field trials will allow for improvements and comparisons of placement techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".