Clinicopathological factors associated with HER2-positive gastric cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer remains a most challenging task in the clinical practice. Recently, targeted therapies have significantly impacted the treatment strategy for many common malignancies. The use of trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; also known as ERBB2), plus chemotherapy proved to improve median overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer, compared with chemotherapy alone in Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer (ToGA) trial. However, the prognostic value of HER2 status in gastric cancer remains controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinical pathology significance of HER2 overexpression in resectable gastric cancer for selecting the right patients with gastric cancer who may benefit from trastuzumab treatment. METHODS: Publications reported the clinicopathological factors associated with HER2 status in gastric cancer from 2012 to 2017 were collected. The literature databases, such as "Cochrane Library", "Sciencedirect", "Springer", "PubMed", "Embase", were extensively searched to retrieve the clinical studies of HER2 expression in gastric cancer. The major outcomes measures were odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% CIs. Statistical analysis was carried out by Revman software 5.3. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of evidence. RESULT: Fifteen studies met our inclusion criteria. This study demonstrated that the pooled OR for HER2 positivity was associated with being male (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.23-1.64), well/moderately differentiated tumor (OR: 2.76; 95% CI: 1.72-4.45), and for intestinal-type tumor (OR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.25-0.38). However, it had no correlation with depth of tumor (P = .07), venous invasion (P = .82), and lymphovascular invasion (P = .24). CONCLUSION: HER2-positive expression was associated with male gender, intestinal type, and well/moderate cell differentiation. We recommend that those gastric cancer patients who may benefit from trastuzumab treatment should be subjected to targeted therapies. However, detecting HER2 status may contribute to the target therapy for gastric carcinoma using trastuzumab. This would be strengthened by further studies incorporating comorbidity data, and outcomes from centralized programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".