MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766619863 · doi:10.1115/icone25-66914

Development and Comparison of a Heat-Transfer Correlation for Supercritical Refrigerants

2017· article· en· W2766619863 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Tarsitano, Khalil Sidawi, Igor Pioro

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat transfer and supercritical fluids
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersInternational Atomic Energy Agency
KeywordsRefrigerantSupercritical fluidHeat transferThermodynamicsRange (aeronautics)Materials scienceHeat exchanger

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this paper is to act as a collection of multiple different heat-transfer correlations and to check their accuracy when compared to experimental data obtained in supercritical-pressure refrigerants (R-22 and R-134a). This paper is also intended to collect as much relevant data of heat transfer in supercritical refrigerants as possible for future research. The experimental data have been retrieved from graphs within a wide range of operating parameters. This study is in support of potential use of supercritical refrigerants as modeling fluids instead of supercritical water. The use of refrigerants as modelling fluids instead of water will allow to decrease costs and technical difficulties during experiments at supercritical pressures and widen operating ranges, because the critical parameters of refrigerants are significantly lower than those of water. The research was completed by collecting graphed data from several different experimental series using both R-22 and R-134a data. The advantage of comparing different refrigerants for determining correlation accuracy is to increase the predictability for other potential experiments using refrigerants. All data are taken from bare-tube experiments to produce a relative baseline for heat-transfer characteristics. These experiments have been performed within the following range: Inner tube diameter ranging between 4.4 mm to 13 mm, pressure ranging between 4.3 MPa to 5.5 MPa, and at a number of various mass and heat fluxes. Sixteen potential heat-transfer correlations have been selected and used in this assessment. The correlation by Watts and Chou [1] and Cheng et al. [2] were shown to have the lowest root-mean-square error. Other correlations with the reasonable accuracy include Mokry et al. [3] and Swenson et al. [4] correlations. However, it was decided to develop a new correlation based on these refrigerant data in an attempt to increase the prediction accuracy. Therefore, based on the Mokry et al. [3] correlation a modified correlation was developed, which generalized the experimental Freon data with higher accuracy than the know correlations. This correlation is intended to create a basis for further study on the use of refrigerants as modeling fluids. While Freon has similar properties to water at supercritical conditions, the different molecular properties causes factors to affect each fluid differently. For refrigerants at supercritical conditions, the factors that seem to have the most effect are the dynamic viscosity and density of a fluid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat transfer and supercritical fluidsFrench-language works237,207