MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766634783 · doi:10.1353/com.2017.0027

The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy by Maggie Berg and Barbara K. Seeber

2017· article· en· W2766634783 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œComparatist/Comparatist · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistory of Science and Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporatizationSociologyResistance (ecology)PleasureHumanismHappinessSincerityMedia studiesPsychologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy by Maggie Berg and Barbara K. Seeber Jeffrey R. Di Leo Maggie Berg and Barbara K. Seeber, The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press, 2016. x + 115 pp. "We are Slow Professors," announce the co-authors of this book (ix). "We believe that adopting the principles of Slow into our professional practice is an effective way to alleviate work stress, preserve humanistic education, and resist the corporate university" (ix). "Corporatization," they continue, "has compromised academic life and sped up the clock" (x). The Slow Professor is a practical book aimed at convincing us to slow down all aspects of our academic lives as both an act of resistance to the corporatization of higher education as well as an endeavor to bring more pleasure and happiness into our academic lives. The co-authors of this manifesto, two Canadian professors of English, give a heartfelt defense for slowing down academic life. While in the hands of other authors, this project might have come off as a shameless attempt to get academic attention by defending a controversial thesis ("Professors need to slow down!") and fashionable topic (there is a "slow" book out now for just about everything including most recently, philosophy [Michelle Boulous Walker, Slow Philosophy: Reading Against the Institution (Bloomsbury, 2017)]), Maggie Berg of Queen's University and Barbara K. Seeber of Brock University manage to avoid this primarily because of the sincerity of their commitment to "slowness." Telephone conversations about coping with life in the corporate academy between Berg and Seeber led them to envision writing, in part, "a self-help book for academics" that would be "structured for reader ease" (13). Drawing on a wide range of sources advocating slowness such as the "Slow Food movement" (34) with its "focus on local artisans" (51) to "defend the … pleasures of food under threat from standardization and fast food" (Geoff Andrews, The Slow Food Story: Politics and Pleasure [Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2008], 17–18), and Carl Honoré's In Praise of Slow: How a Worldwide Movement Is Challenging the Cult of Speed (Toronto: Vintage, 2004), Berg and Seeber make a compelling case for slowing down the increasing speed of academic life. But for those among us who are not and will never become "slow" professors, this book will be a bit difficult to digest, especially the first chapter. Entitled, "Time Management and Timelessness," it surveys a number of ways to save time in pursuance of our academic life only to throw them out the window because of their similarity to the aims of the corporate university. As someone who has utilized a number of these methods of increasing productivity and efficiency, as well as others not only as a professional academic but also as a student from high school through graduate school, it is hard to agree with their suggestion that we should do [End Page 377] away with them—and adopt instead "a counterculture, a Slow culture that values balance and that dares to be skeptical of the professions of productivity" (21). Here's an example: Donald E. Hall has argued that we need to "set … realistic daily and weekly goals," and suggests that we need to save Saturday's for research and twelve hours on Sunday for grading and class preparation (20). Hall's suggestions are provided as a way of increasing our research productivity even if we have high teaching loads like 4/4 or above. While I'm not a big proponent of Sunday preparation and grading, I don't see anything wrong with doing reading, writing, and research on the weekends, especially if this is something one enjoys doing. Also, setting not only "realistic daily and weekly goals," but also monthly and yearly goals seems to me to be a good healthy habit. For me, the habit of goal setting did not come from reading one of Donald E. Hall's articles on how to make oneself a more productive academic, rather it came out of educational practices that started in secondary school. Teachers in grade school and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.468
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it