In vitro immunomodulation of splenocytes from DO11.10 mice by the food colouring agent amaranth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The chemical amaranth (AM) is permitted as a colouring agent in a variety of foods. Safety was established based on chronic rodent studies. AM and its metabolite naphthionic acid (NA) can be absorbed through the intestine, exposing circulating immune cells including splenocytes. An AM feeding study in rats demonstrated an increase in blood lymphocytes. Yet, in contrast, AM inhibited the delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to antigen. DO11.10 mice express a T Cell Receptor specific for ovalbumin 323-339 peptide (OVAp) presented by I-A d MHCII. DO11.10 splenocytes were cultured to evaluate mechanisms by which AM and NA modulate immune cell function in vitro . Exposure to OVAp alone for 72 h induced cell proliferation, and combination with 2 or 20 μg/mL AM increased IFN-γ. Cytotoxicity was evident at higher concentrations of AM (200 and 2000 μg/mL) and NA (2000 μg/mL) in combination with OVAp, as both cell number and cytokine secretion decreased. At 200 μg/mL AM with OVAp, immunotoxicity gene expression was modified and OVAp-specific KJ1-26 + CD28 + cells became enriched. The equivalent dose of NA did not modify those parameters. Using an antigen-specific model in vitro , lower concentrations of AM potentiated pro-inflammatory cytokine production, and higher concentrations of AM and NA demonstrated cytotoxicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".