MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766652537 · doi:10.18778/7969-262-0.18

Pokolenie Y na turystycznym rynku pracy

2014· book-chapter· pl· W2766652537 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Issues in Poland
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generation Y is making up an increasingly larger percentage of the workforce and it is believed to
\napproach employment in a manner different to that of their predecessors. As the tourism industry
\nrelies to a great extent on young employees, it will be affected more severely than most other
\nindustries by the entrance of generation Y. The objective of the paper is to explore the aspects
\nrepresentatives of generation Y find important in choosing a future career and to investigate the
\nextent the tourism industry is believed to offer these aspects. The paper is structured as follows.
\nFirst, the rationale for the research is given and characteristics of generation Y are identified. The
\nsecond section gives insight to investigations on their work-related values and attitudes. Methodology
\nand findings of the empirical study are presented in the third section. Finally, recommendations
\nfor tourism employers are made and guidelines for future research are proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it