Functional Sequential and Trigonometric Summability of Real and Complex Functions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Limit summability of functions was introduced as a new approach to extensions of the summation of real and complex functions, and also evaluating antidifferences. Also, limit summand functions generalize the (logarithm of) Gamma-type functions satisfying the functional equation F(x + 1) = f(x)F(x). Recently, another approach to the topic entitled analytic summability of functions, has been introduced and studied by the author. Since some functions are neither limit nor analytic summable, several types of summabilities are needed for improving the problem. Here, I introduce and study functional sequential summability of real and complex functions for obtaining multiple approaches to them. We not only show that the analytic summability is a type of functional sequential summability but also obtain trigonometric summability (for functions with a fourier series) as another its type. Hence, we arrive at a class of real and complex function spaces with various properties. Thereafter, we prove several properties of functional sequential, and also many criteria for trigonometric summability. Finally, we state many problems and future directions for the researches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it