MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766702800 · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.094

Performance Research on Heat Pump Using Blends of R744 with Eco-friendly Working Fluid

2017· article· en· W2766702800 on OpenAlexaff
Xianping Zhang, Fang Wang, Zhiming Liu, Junjie Gu, Feiyu Zhu, Q.S Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoefficient of performanceHeat pumpRefrigerantTranscritical cycleWorking fluidSuperheatingGas compressorThermodynamicsWork (physics)Materials scienceGlobal-warming potentialFreonEnvironmentally friendlyRefrigerationProcess engineeringNuclear engineeringEnvironmental scienceHeat exchangerEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to protect the environment and save energy, new refrigerants with zero ozone depleting potential, low global warming potential have been investigated by more and more researches to substitute HCFCs/ HFCs for eco-friendly working fluid. Among alternatives, non-azeotropic mixtures are becoming the more potential and important candidates. In this research, the transcritical system performances of water heater heat pump using R744/DME (dimethyl ether) binary mixture as working fluid were theoretically analyzed. On mix R744 with DME in a smaller mass fraction, both the optimum heat rejection pressure and the heating coefficient of performance (COP) are decreased. The mean relative reduction rate of optimum heat rejection pressure, however, is greater than that of heating COP. Also, the influence of superheat degree at the inlet of compressor upon the optimum heat rejection pressure and the heating COP is also discussed. The results show that the R744/DME can work as a promising alternative to replace with current widely-used Freons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia EngineeringSame topicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207