MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766721904 · doi:10.1002/gj.3019

Sources of ore‐forming material for Pb‐Zn deposits in the Sichuan‐Yunnan‐Guizhou triangle area: Multiple constraints from C‐H‐O‐S‐Pb‐Sr isotopic compositions

2017· article· en· W2766721904 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGeologyCarbonateDolomiteGeochemistryPermianMineralogySeawaterHydrothermal circulationMetamorphic rockMeteoric waterCalcitePyriteChemistryPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sichuan‐Yunnan‐Guizhou Pb‐Zn triangle area is located in the western margin of the Yangtze Block and comprises more than 400 ore deposits or prospects. This triangular area contains 200 million tons of ores at average grades of 5 wt.% Pb and 10 wt.% Zn. The Pb‐Zn ore bodies are mainly distributed as stratoid and vein types within the Neoproterozoic to Permian carbonate rocks, which are typical epigenetic Pb‐Zn mineralizations. Previous studies have mainly focused on individual deposits. In this study, the compositions of C‐H‐O‐S‐Pb‐Sr isotopes of approximately 20 typical deposits are summarized and studied in detail to reveal the source of the ore‐forming material. δ 13 C PDB ‐ δ 18 O SMOW isotopic compositions of the hydrothermal calcite, dolomite, and fluid inclusions show that CO 2 in the ore‐forming fluids could have been derived from marine carbonate with subordinate incorporation of organic matter. In addition, δD H2O ‐ δ 18 O H2O isotopic studies also indicate the multisource features of the ore‐forming fluids, for example, meteoric water and metamorphic water; meanwhile, some deposits are related to organic fluids. The δ 34 S values of most sulphide minerals range from +9.0‰ to +28.6‰, similar to late Neoproterozoic to Permian seawater sulphate (+8.0‰ to +38.7‰). This similarity suggests that the reduced sulphur in sulphides could have been mainly derived from the thermochemical sulphate reduction of the host strata seawater sulphate. In addition, thermal decomposition of sulphur‐bearing organic matter could have provided some of the reduced sulphur for mineralization in some Pb‐Zn deposits. The Pb isotopic compositions of the sulphides from most deposits are totally homogeneous and located between the crustal Pb and orogenic Pb evolution curves. Comparing these deposits with the regional basement rocks, sedimentary strata, and Permian Emeishan basalts, we propose that the metals for Pb‐Zn mineralization were mainly derived from the basement rocks and sedimentary country rocks. For some deposits (e.g., Jinshachang) with highly radiogenic Pb isotopic compositions, their Pb mainly originated from Precambrian basement carbonaceous slate and Lower Cambrian shales. The ( 87 Sr/ 86 Sr) t ratios of sphalerite, hydrothermal calcite, and fluorite range from 0.7099 to 0.7469, higher than those of the regional sediments and the Emeishan basalts, but lower than those of the Proterozoic basement rocks. Such features also indicate the mixing source for Sr in sulphides and ore‐forming fluids. The comprehensive study of multiple C‐H‐O‐S‐Pb‐Sr isotopes from typical deposits suggests mixed sources for the ore‐forming fluids and materials in this triangular area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it