Full-Mobility Three-CCC Parallel-Kinematics Machines: Kinematics and Isotropic Design
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The subject of this paper is twofold: the kinematics and the isotropic design of six degrees-of-freedom (DOF), three-CCC parallel-kinematics machines (PKMs). Upon proper embodiment and dimensioning, the PKMs discussed here, with all actuators mounted on the base, exhibit interesting features, not found elsewhere. One is the existence of an isotropy locus, as opposed to isolated isotropy points in the workspace, thereby guaranteeing the accuracy and the homogeneity of the motion of the moving platform (MP) along different directions within a significantly large region of their workspace. The conditions leading to such a locus are discussed in depth; several typical isotropic designs are brought to the limelight. Moreover, the kinematic analysis shows that rotation and translation of the MP are decoupled, which greatly simplifies not only the kinetostatic analysis but also, most importantly, their control. Moreover, it is shown that the singularity loci of this class of mechanism are determined only by the orientation of their MP, which also simplifies locus evaluation and eases its representation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it