Receiver Energy Efficiency and Resolution Profile Design for Massive MIMO Uplink With Mixed ADC
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper considers the uplink of multiuser massive multi-input multi-output systems with a mixed analog-to-digital converter (ADC) architecture, in which the base station (BS) is equipped with ADCs of different resolution levels. While higher resolution, ADCs reduce the quantization error to improve the performance; they also incur higher energy. This paper studies the receive energy efficiency (EE) and the ADC resolution profile design under the maximum-ratio combining receiver. First, closed-form approximations for the spectral efficiency (SE) and receive EE are derived for a general mixed ADC structure. Then, the ADC resolution profile optimization problem that maximizes the receive EE with respect to SE requirement is formulated. An algorithm based on decremental searching and dynamic programming is proposed whose complexity is linear in the number of BS antennas. Numerical results verify that with the proposed design, the mixed-ADC receiver can have nearly the same SE performance as the all full-resolution one but with considerably lighter burden of energy consumption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it