Concentric ring array synthesis using Taguchi algorithm for MIMO applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we study an electromagnetic optimization technique using Taguchi's method and apply it to concentric ring antenna array design. Taguchi's method was developped on the basis of the orthogonal array (OA) concept, which offers systematic and efficient characteristics. The newly proposed idea is the implementation of Taguchi optimization method for Concentric Circular Antenna Array (CCAA). The optimization procedure is then used to provide an optimum set of weights for different CCAAs. Obtained results show that the desired radiation pattern with optimum sidelobe level (SLL) reduction is successfully achieved. The numerically simulated patterns are obtained and compared with those of concentric circular isotropic arrays (12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 elements). Compared to traditional optimization techniques and well-known algorithms (Evolutionary Programming (EP) algorithm and Firefly Algorithm (FA)), Taguchi's method is easy to implement and efficient to reach the optimum solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it