MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766802441 · doi:10.7202/1041540ar

Les papyrus iatromagiques grecs d’Égypte : entre mythe et réalité

2017· article· fr· W2766802441 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Roxanne Bélanger Sarrazin

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers d histoire · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPapyrusHumanitiesArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans l’Antiquité, la magie représentait un moyen alternatif pour faire face aux réalités quotidiennes lorsque les méthodes traditionnelles (religion, médecine) ne fonctionnaient pas. Parmi ces réalités, nous retrouvons entre autres la maladie, qui était la cible des papyrus iatromagiques (médico-magiques). Or, certains de ces papyrus contenaient des références à des récits mythologiques, utilisés dans le cadre d’une magie sympathique, ou analogie persuasive. Par exemple, le fait d’inclure un récit mentionnant une guérison dans le papyrus magique avait pour but de produire un effet similaire chez le bénéficiaire. Cet article identifiera quelques études de cas de papyrus iatromagiques contenant des références à des récits mythologiques. Dans chaque cas, il identifiera quels types de récits étaient utilisés, mais surtout pourquoi et comment ils étaient utilisés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.721
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0220.011
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers d histoireSame topicHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical StudiesFrench-language works237,207