MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766864434 · doi:10.5430/jst.v8n1p15

Ameloblastic carcinoma of the maxilla: A rare case presentation and a review of new cases

2017· review· en· W2766864434 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Soudabeh Sargolzaei, Arash Khaleghjoo, Nasim Taghavi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Solid Tumors · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral and Maxillofacial Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaxillaPresentation (obstetrics)MedicineOdontogenicMandible (arthropod mouthpart)Case presentationOdontogenic tumorOrthodonticsDentistryRadiologyPathologySurgeryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ameloblastic carcinoma (AC) is a relatively rare tumor which accounts for less than 4% of odontogenic tumors. The mandible is the preferred site and occurrence in the maxilla is extremely rare. Here, we report the case of a 40-year-old male with maxillary AC and present a review of the reported cases from 2009 to 2017 in English literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Solid TumorsSame topicOral and Maxillofacial PathologyFrench-language works237,207