[P1–429]: FUNCTIONAL MRI OF TABLET‐BASED COMPUTERIZED PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING (PAL) WITH IMPROVED ECOLOGICAL VALIDITY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Administered with a computerized touch-screen display, PAL assists in characterizing memory and learning deficits in patients with probable early Alzheimer's disease (AD) (Blackwell Dement-Geriatr-Cogn-Disord 2003). FMRI may clarify the relationship between PAL performance and brain activity, but ecological validity is a concern during complex motor tasks. Previously, we developed an fMRI-compatible tablet including visual feedback of hand position (VFHP) and an augmented reality display (Tam HBM-2011; Karimpoor Frontiers-2015) to address this issue for AD patients with impaired motor planning (Ghilardi BrainRes-2000). The purpose of the present work is to characterize brain activity for an ecologically valid fMRI computerized PAL test. Prior to testing AD patients, initial work involved young adults. The PAL test involves making associative judgements of an increasing number of patterns (1–6 patterns) and their locations on the screen (Fig.1). Each task is repeated twice in a mixed fMRI design interspersed with baseline visual fixation. Ten young healthy right-handed adults performed PAL at 3T. The PRONTO toolkit was used to optimize fMRI preprocessing pipelines (Churchill PloSone-2015), and obtain Z-scored maps of retrieval phase vs. baseline, using a uni-variate Gauss Naïve Base (GNB) model. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed on the Z-scored activation maps to obtain brain patterns explaining maximum variance across the group. Fig 2.a shows group maps during retrieval of 3 patterns (3pat) vs. baseline. Fig 2.b shows 6 patterns (6pat) vs. baseline. Increased activity in medial temporal lobe and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is observed during 6pat compared to 3pat, consistent with the different difficulty levels. Activation of left ventral premotor cortex is consistent with visually-guided hand actions. Extensive activation of the left middle frontal gyrus, superior parietal lobule, and basal ganglia is observed during 6pat, compared to 3pat; consistent with differences in complex motor planning and visuospatial understanding. Results suggest that the fMRI-compatible tablet with VFHP enables PAL tests with good ecological validity involving complex fine motor movements. These methods and findings are relevant to future fMRI studies of AD patients; involving batteries of tasks required to probe different cognitive domains during limited scan time. fMRI-compatible PAL test. The first principal component depicting brain activity for 10 subjects performing PAL. a) Retrieval 3 patterns vs. baseline. b) Retrieval 6 patterns vs. baseline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".