MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766888437 · doi:10.12681/hpsa.14437

John H. Kautsky, Social Democracy and Aristocracy: Why socialist labor movements developed in some industrial countries and not in others, [Σοσιαλδημοκρατία και Αριστοκρατία: γιατί αναπτύχθηκαν σοσιαλιστικά εργατικά κινήματα σε ορισμένα βιομηχανικά κράτη και όχι σε άλλα;], Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick 2001, 231 σελ.

2017· article· el· W2766888437 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ιάκωβος Μέκιος

Bibliographic record

VenueΕλληνική Επιθεώρηση Πολιτικής Επιστήμης · 2017
Typearticle
Languageel
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policy and Reform Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAristocracy (class)Database transactionDemocracyEconomic historySocial democracySocial Democratic PartyPolitical scienceEconomicsEconomic systemPolitical economySociologyPoliticsLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Δεν διατίθεται περίληψη / no abstract available

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.017
Scholarly communication0.0050.011
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueΕλληνική Επιθεώρηση Πολιτικής ΕπιστήμηςSame topicSocial Policy and Reform StudiesFrench-language works237,207