MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766917832 · doi:10.1177/1468087417736997

Numerical studies of the ignition characteristics of a high-pressure gas jet in compression ignition engines with glow plug ignition assist: Part 2-Effects of multi-opening glow plug shields

2017· article· en· W2766917832 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Engine Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpark plugIgnition systemShieldShieldsNuclear engineeringDiamondMaterials scienceCombustionEngine knockingIgnition timingMechanicsHomogeneous charge compression ignitionComposite materialElectromagnetic shieldingMechanical engineeringChemistryCombustion chamberGeologyEngineeringPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The results of a previous study, part 1, showed that use of a shield can improve the thermal performance of a glow plug, and thereby reduce ignition time. However, the part 1 study also found that use of a simple shield with only one circular opening can delay flame propagation out of the shield. The conclusions of that study suggested that there is scope for further improvements of the shield design, especially the shield opening geometry. Accordingly, this article presents the results of computational studies investigating the influence of multi-opening shield designs on natural gas ignition characteristics in glow plug–assisted compression–ignition engines. Two types of multi-opening glow plug shield, consisting of four small circular openings distributed in either diamond-pattern or square-pattern arrangements, were employed. The simulated results demonstrated that both multi-opening shields can not only increase glow plug surface temperature, but also increase the residence time of fuel mixture adjacent to the glow plug surface in the early injection stage, resulting in a faster ignition than the single-opening shield. Furthermore, the diamond-pattern multi-opening glow plug shield provides a faster or comparable flame propagation path back to combustion chamber, compared to single-opening glow plug shield, while the square-pattern multi-opening glow plug shield delays the flame propagation under several specific engine conditions. Compared to the single-opening glow plug shield, the overall natural gas ignition delays are further reduced by 6%–44% when using the diamond-pattern multi-opening glow plug shield, while the square-pattern multi-opening glow plug shield is only able to reduce the natural gas ignition delay under a few specific conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.278
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it