MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2766943580 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23061

Fault detection for nonlinear systems with unreliable measurements based on hierarchy cubature Kalman filter

2017· article· en· W2766943580 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsKalman filterFault (geology)Moment (physics)Fault detection and isolationNonlinear systemComputer scienceHierarchyPoint (geometry)Reliability (semiconductor)Filter (signal processing)Control theory (sociology)AlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper is concerned with fault detection of a kind of nonlinear dynamic system. Based on the framework of hierarchy information processing, the scope of the fault is first located by use of the presented windowing cubature Kalman filter (WCKF), followed by point‐by‐point fault detection to locate the fault by use of the residuals of each moment within the suspected windows. Theoretical analysis and experiments show that the presented algorithm is more effective than the traditional point‐by‐point fault detection method that only uses the moment residuals. The presented algorithm has potential value in many application fields, such as fault detection, reliability evaluation, fault tolerant control, etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it